Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 14:43:27 -0500 | From | Fuzzy Fox <> | Subject | Re: smbfs permissions problem (2.2.6ac1) |
| |
Mike Frisch <frisch@hcl.com> wrote: > > rm: temp/file: Permission denied > rm: temp: Text file busy > > If I 'chmod' this files to 644, I can remove the directory without > incident. > > Is this correct behaviour?
It's not correct behavior for Unix. But it is correct behavior for Windows. Servers can implement permissions however they like. In Unix, permission to write the parent directory gives permission to delete. In Windows, read-only permission implies no-delete permission.
-- fox@dallas.net (Fuzzy Fox) || "Nothing takes the taste out of peanut sometimes known as David DeSimone || butter quite like unrequited love." http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ || -- Charlie Brown
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |