[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Configurable larger physical memory
Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> No, I there's another problem of people setting it as high as they
> possibly can ("hey, I might put 3G of ram in here someday...") without
> realizing that there are tradeoffs and they probably want the default.
> I think the question should be phrased as "Limit userspace memory to..."
> instead of "Maximum physical memory..." for this reason.

Hm, no, that doesn't make sense. Who would limit userspace memory?
Perhaps "Physical RAM/Userspace tradeoff" would be more appropriate, and

1GB RAM/3GB Userspace
2GB RAM/2GB Userspace
3GB RAM/1GB Userspace
4GB RAM/192MB Userspace

or something like that, and there certainly has to be documentation.
BTW: Is it really still necessary for the kernel to access all the
phyiscal RAM? I understand that it has to access memory mapped IO, and
it's own address space, but the rest? I can't see such a design in the
68k architecture specific part, or am I just missing something?

Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.056 / U:2.000 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site