lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: bad lmbench numbers for mmap
    Date
    > I don't see that this problem should be anything new. 
    > Have we ever been any good at lat_mmap?

    I have numbers that we have been. With 2.1.103 on a 167MHz Ultra1 I got 1505
    usec, with 2.2.5 on a 249MHz Ultra2 I got ~58000 usec. That's a huge
    difference.

    Cheers,
    Jakub
    ___________________________________________________________________
    Jakub Jelinek | jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz
    Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
    ___________________________________________________________________
    UltraLinux | http://ultra.linux.cz/ | http://ultra.penguin.cz/
    Linux version 2.2.5 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips)
    ___________________________________________________________________

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.017 / U:93.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site