[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: bad lmbench numbers for mmap
    > I don't see that this problem should be anything new. 
    > Have we ever been any good at lat_mmap?

    I have numbers that we have been. With 2.1.103 on a 167MHz Ultra1 I got 1505
    usec, with 2.2.5 on a 249MHz Ultra2 I got ~58000 usec. That's a huge

    Jakub Jelinek | |
    Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
    UltraLinux | |
    Linux version 2.2.5 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.026 / U:166.368 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site