[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: bad lmbench numbers for mmap
> I don't see that this problem should be anything new. 
> Have we ever been any good at lat_mmap?

I have numbers that we have been. With 2.1.103 on a 167MHz Ultra1 I got 1505
usec, with 2.2.5 on a 249MHz Ultra2 I got ~58000 usec. That's a huge
Jakub Jelinek | |
Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
UltraLinux | |
Linux version 2.2.5 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean