Messages in this thread | | | From | Jakub Jelinek <> | Subject | Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap | Date | Sat, 17 Apr 1999 09:32:52 +0200 (CEST) |
| |
> I don't see that this problem should be anything new. > Have we ever been any good at lat_mmap?
I have numbers that we have been. With 2.1.103 on a 167MHz Ultra1 I got 1505 usec, with 2.2.5 on a 249MHz Ultra2 I got ~58000 usec. That's a huge difference.
Cheers, Jakub ___________________________________________________________________ Jakub Jelinek | jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University ___________________________________________________________________ UltraLinux | http://ultra.linux.cz/ | http://ultra.penguin.cz/ Linux version 2.2.5 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips) ___________________________________________________________________
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |