lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: setuids() like setgroups() ?
Date
In article <cistron.m10YBDR-0007TvC@the-village.bc.nu>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> However, this is very non-standard and the cances of this getting
>> implemented are very low, I guess. The reason I am asking this is that
>> I am considering hacking Apache and the kernel for UID swtching -
>> wondering if it should be a quick&dirty local hack, or something reasonably
>> clean so I can try to get it integrated into Linux and Apache.
>
>How do you solve pid reuse ?

PID reuse? The task struct would just contain a struct switchuid * with
all the valid uid/gid pairs. Probably inherited on fork, not on exec.

>> Aha, that would be SCM_SETCREDENTIALS ? I'm curious about this. It
>> seems to be the easiest (and most probable) solution for now.
>
>Yes. Exactly - it then means that a client can for example pass a request
>to a server along with the right for the server to assume its identity. And
>vice versa the client can ask the server "I want to become fred = auth is .."
>and have the server return "no" or "yes - auth sent"

Does any existing OS already implement this so I can read the manpages
or the source code, or would this be a Linux-specific extension. And
what would the proper name actually be - SCM_SETCREDENTIALS ?
SCM_PASSCREDENTIALS ?

Yes I've seached using Altavista, Hotbot and Dejanews but couldn't
find anything on the subject

Mike.
--
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site