Messages in this thread | | | From | alex.buell@tahallah ... | Date | Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:12:19 +0100 (BST) | Subject | RMS - No not the man himself! (Was Re: caps in elf, next itteration (the hack get's bigger) |
| |
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On VMS record I/O isn't a kernel issue anyway. RMS is a library -- > the only I/O syscall is SYS$QIO[W] which just moves blocks. RMS also > handles the fancy locking needed by simple transaction systems. Only > the locking primitives themselves are kernel functions. On days when > I feel like offending thousands at a stroke, I toy with the idea of > writing an RMS-like library for Unix. :-)
What, Richard Stallman is a library? 8) SYS$QIOW(RMS, GNU) RMS$GET, RMS$READ, RMS$WRITE SYS$BRKTHRU SYS$TRNLNM(USER$FAO1, "RMS") ... gosh, I can still remember some of my DCL stuff... and all these lovely TMPMBX, CMKRNL, BUGCHECK privs...
(PS: For a laugh, you might like to check out http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk/humour/university/hitchhacker.html)
Yes, please do offend all the UNIX purists by writing a RMS clone..
Cheers, Alex -- "A mind opened by new ideas cannot return to its original limits"
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |