Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: more on hash functions | Date | Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:41:21 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> in theory that's true. however, i also tried a pair of 10 (or 12) bit > random tables x-ored together without shifting, and the result wasn't much > better. i think you can get away with this if your input data allows it.
Tables that big start to cost you in cache misses what you saved in multiplies
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |