[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: OFFTOPIC: New MBR and partitioning standard?
    On Sat, 06 Mar 1999, Dave Cinege wrote:
    >Isn't it about time the x86 platform supported more then 4 'real' partitions?
    >I'm getting really sick of this limitation and was thinking of sitting down
    >with some peers, drafting a new extended MBR standard, then submitting it OS
    >For instance, the first partition is (generally) started on the 65th sector.
    >That leaves 63 512byte sectors that are always free. Why not extend the normal
    >partition entires say 16 sectors (== about 512 16byte partition entires),
    >and reserve the remaining sectors for extended MBR code? (IE the code in
    >sector 0, hops to sector 18)

    Why wait for general acceptance? An extension of this sort can be implemented
    OS-by-OS, with non-compatible OS's using the old extended partition system.
    Just put some kind of checksum and magic number in the extended MBR area :)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.026 / U:1.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site