[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: OSDI paper - IO-Lite: A Unified I/O Buffering and Caching System

    > From: Oliver Xymoron <>
    > Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:41:28 -0600 (CST)
    > To: Jim Gettys <>
    > Cc: linux-kernel <>
    > Subject: Re: OSDI paper - IO-Lite: A Unified I/O Buffering and Caching System
    > -----
    > On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Jim Gettys wrote:
    > > It shows a new I/O approach that is very general and flexible, and avoids
    > > data copies with minimal overhead, even between processes. The authors
    > > use as an example Web service, and show very good performance gains.
    > Very interesting. We probably wouldn't see quite the gains the author saw
    > with his FreeBSD implementation. It's a good match for FreeBSD as it
    > already has a zero-copy scheme in a lot of areas and fits better with
    > their design philosophy. Linux largely avoids VM manipulations like those
    > suggested for instance by I/O-Lite's IPC scheme, because of their nasty
    > effect on CPU caches, SMP scaling, etc. So parts of it are going to be a
    > hard sell. And we've got sendfile(2) now, which is not nearly as pretty or
    > generic, but might still give similar performance at least for the common
    > web server case.

    Sendfile does not help the CGI case, which is very common (or dominant)
    on many (most) high volume servers.

    I believe it will also help the CPU cache case for CGI; it avoids having
    to touch the data again in many operations, which would pollute the cache
    with data that was merely copied in the web server.
    - Jim

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.020 / U:70.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site