Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Mar 1999 21:19:06 -0700 (MST) | From | "Karl F. Larsen" <> | Subject | Re: kernel 2.2.3 and pppd |
| |
Sorry Ray, my serial ports are all spelled out correctly. Demesg is correct in the serial part at least...:-)
Point of referance: I ran an installfest last weekend. Used the Mandrake-Red Hat Cheapbytes cd-rom. About 4 users took the 2.2.1 kernel that is supplied. All 4 came by last week and complained and had to load the old kernel. These are collage kids.
On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Ray Rallison wrote:
} } On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Karl F. Larsen wrote: } } > The problem is getting pppd to work with kernel 2.2.3 on a } > Red Hat version 5.2 computer. The pppd version is the latest done } > March 11 1999. All works fine under the 2.0.36 kernel. } <snip> } > Mar 20 21:16:37 cannac pppd[636]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xa9f02865> <pcomp> <accomp>] } > Mar 20 21:17:04 cannac last message repeated 9 times } > Mar 20 21:17:07 cannac pppd[636]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests } > Mar 20 21:17:07 cannac pppd[636]: Connection terminated. } > Mar 20 21:17:07 cannac pppd[636]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean: } > Mar 20 21:17:07 cannac pppd[636]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0 } > Mar 20 21:17:08 cannac pppd[636]: Exit. } > } > Any help would be most welcome. The new kernel has beat me! } } I had a problem very similar to this when I upgraded my server to 2.2.1. } It turned out that the newer kernel was detecting my 16550A UART's as } 16750's. Commenting out the 16750 detection code fixed it. } } Your problem is probably something different as I suspect the incorrect } detection is rare, but check the output of dmesg just in case. } } Hope that helps, } Ray } }
Best wishes
- Karl F. Larsen, k5di@totacc.com (505) 524-3303 -
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |