[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: disk head scheduling
    On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 10:41:31AM -0800, David Lang wrote:
    > > Well of course a 2-way elevator should sort by *ascending* sector within
    > > descending track. I take it this is difficult?
    > >
    > > --
    > Many (most? all new?) IDE drives lie to you about the real
    > heads/sectors of the drive so you do not have the ability to do this
    > accuratly.

    Yeah, but some manufacturers are good enough to put it in the tech notes.
    Should the scheduling algo be put in as a device strategy function, with
    fallback to the current elevator if the device doesnt have one? Then we could
    implement two way elevator algos for those hard disks for which we can get
    physical geometry info from the data sheets or somewhere.

    And another probably dumb question which should be answered by rtfs, but here
    goes anyway:
    what happens for devices like ramdisks or loopback devices etc for which
    scheduling in random order is ok anyway?

    -- arvind

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.032 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site