Messages in this thread | | | From | (Matthias Urlichs) | Subject | Re: bind 8.2 will not compile with Linux kernel 2.2.3 | Date | 18 Mar 1999 13:06:59 +0100 |
| |
doctor@fruitbat.org writes: > The move to glibc2 is very painful, especially if you have a lot of > apps you've built yourself that you'd have to re-build as a result. So, > don't go thinking glibc is the greatest thing since sliced-white-bread, > because it isn't. > You don't have to rebuild _any_ applications if you go from libc5 to glibc. Why do you think you need to do that??
The move from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1 is a bit more painful, unfortunately, but that wasn't the question.
NB, of _course_ glibc is the best thing since sliced bread. Just ask anybody who helped to actually write the thing. ;-)
-- Matthias Urlichs | noris network GmbH | smurf@noris.de | ICQ: 20193661 The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://www.noris.de/~smurf/ -- The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is its inefficiency. -- Eugene McCarthy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |