lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: bind 8.2 will not compile with Linux kernel 2.2.3
Date
  doctor@fruitbat.org writes:
> The move to glibc2 is very painful, especially if you have a lot of
> apps you've built yourself that you'd have to re-build as a result. So,
> don't go thinking glibc is the greatest thing since sliced-white-bread,
> because it isn't.
>
You don't have to rebuild _any_ applications if you go from libc5 to glibc.
Why do you think you need to do that??

The move from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1 is a bit more painful, unfortunately,
but that wasn't the question.

NB, of _course_ glibc is the best thing since sliced bread.
Just ask anybody who helped to actually write the thing. ;-)

--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network GmbH | smurf@noris.de | ICQ: 20193661
The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://www.noris.de/~smurf/
--
The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is its inefficiency.
-- Eugene McCarthy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.112 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site