Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: SO_RCVLOWAT? | Date | Thu, 18 Mar 1999 21:36:38 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> It's anoying that it defined but never used. Some programs try to use it > if it's defined, and the get an error. I think either the define should > be removed, or something done with it.
POSIX 1003.1g requires that it is present, that it has a meaningful value on getsockopt (it does) and it optionally may be settable. If you dont like that argue with the standards committee.
2.2.x meets the spec
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |