Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:20:34 -0500 | From | Arvind Sankar <> | Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC]: MS Porting Office to Linux? |
| |
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 11:14:22PM +1100, CaT wrote: > Harald Koenig wrote the following: > > > > On Mar 17, Steve Dodd wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 11:15:07AM +0100, Harald Koenig wrote: > > > > > > > pardon me, but is 2.1 released at all ? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > I checked prep.ai.mit.edu:/pub/gnu/glibc/ and there I only can find > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 86 Feb 11 16:25 glibc-2.1-README > > > > saying > > > > glibc-2.1 has been (temporarily) removed, until some > > political issues are worked out. > > > > > > so, when will glibc 2.1 really be available and which "political issues" > > have to be worked out (for more than a month now) ? > > Yeah. I'm kinda suprised about that not being resolved yet. Basically > you had to have been lucky. Either you got it before it was withdrawn, > you managed to find it in some dark corner of the net or you managed > to get it off a friend who got it. Other then that you're SOL. > > I've managed to get ahold of it. the 112->2.1 patch, 2.1 crypt lib and > 2.1 linuxthreads. > > None of this, ofcourse, helps to answer your question but I felt like > 'bragging' ;)
try ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/glibc/ instead.
-- arvind
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |