Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Feb 1999 07:14:29 +0100 | From | ralf@uni-kobl ... | Subject | Re: linux capabilities and ACLs |
| |
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 06:50:01PM +1300, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > ACLs were specified in POSIX 1003.1e and 1003.2c. However these > > drafts have been dropped. > > I have it on good authority that the proposed POSIX ACLs are broken > in such a way as they are not as secure and might otherwise be > expected. > > I'm still waiting for more concrete details on this if it matters... > (so ask me about it off the list, please people).
Hm... Solaris and IRIX are afaik supposed to implement their ACLs quite close to that standard ...
Ralf
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |