[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux-2.2.0 bad VM behaviour "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdc bs=256k"
> Can you try the patch below (made against 2.2.2-pre2)? The key is to
> recognise that when we wake up bdflush, we need to take into account how
> many dirty buffers there are; but when we decide whether or not to wait
> for the bdflush pass to complete, it is BUF_LOCKED, not BUF_DIRTY,
> buffers which are important. If we don't wait for bdflush once
> BUF_LOCKED grows too high, then we will simply continue to create more
> locked IO buffers until the request queues are completely saturated.

How very appropriate. I've been whining about this to a lot of folks
lately- all of primary memory gets saturated with buffers needing to be
flushed and response time goes to hell.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.056 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site