[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux-2.2.0 bad VM behaviour "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdc bs=256k"
On Thu, 4 Feb 1999, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> In other words, if the number of dirty buffers grows too excessive, then
> we kick of a round of bdflush _and_ wait for the IO to complete,

Agreed. I agree completly with this solution. Waking up faster kflushd as
suggested by Linus had no way to avoid the dirty MM bomb (kflushd is just
wakenup in a rasonable time now, and btw it's behavior it's just completly
customizable via sysctl).

> I'm going to try out combinations of the above on large and small
> machines to make sure we get something which doesn't impact normal
> performance too badly, but I suspect that a simple change like the above
> in refile_buffer will be enough to cure the complete memory anihilating
> behaviour of the new, lean buffer cache code.

I think yes. I have not checked the code yet though.

Andrea Arcangeli

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.139 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site