Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug | Date | Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:44:58 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> I see. So tanking the whole unit is better. That way, if no one is
If there is no init your machine is dead. How can the kernel reparent a task to a task that doesnt exist for example.
> flexibility as to how to proceed in this dire situation (ie. an opportunity > to carry out some other task perhaps, before cycling). I would suggest > that the behavior on loss of init be a toggleable /proc/sys/kernel switch.
Pick. Oops crash maybe reboot v Reboot
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |