[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: fsync on large files
    > For concurrent writes, it may be entirely acceptable to completely _drop_
    > the write semaphore at well-defined places and retry, but that's going to
    > be a per-filesystem thing: the VFS layer is going to basically grab the
    > semaphore and default to complete atomicity. That way it's up to the
    > low-level filesystem to handle concurrency, if the filesystem writer is
    > 100% sure he knows what he is doing.

    Ok. That provides a back door for the "and I do know what I am doing" people.
    That makes a lot of sense then

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.020 / U:26.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site