[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: fsync on large files
> For concurrent writes, it may be entirely acceptable to completely _drop_
> the write semaphore at well-defined places and retry, but that's going to
> be a per-filesystem thing: the VFS layer is going to basically grab the
> semaphore and default to complete atomicity. That way it's up to the
> low-level filesystem to handle concurrency, if the filesystem writer is
> 100% sure he knows what he is doing.

Ok. That provides a back door for the "and I do know what I am doing" people.
That makes a lot of sense then

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.121 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site