Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Interrupts not being raised. | Date | Sun, 14 Feb 1999 08:48:57 +0100 (MET) | From | (Rogier Wolff) |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Adding an 'enable_irq(irq)' after registering the IRQ provokes the > > kernel into saying "enable_irq() unbalanced from 00000009", but doesn't ^^^^^^^^^ > > actually make it work. > > a registered IRQ is automatically enabled.
The underlined address sounds as if you compiled your kenrel using "-f omit-frame-pointer". There is a gcc bug in builtin_return_address when that option is enabled.
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * Never blow in a cat's ear because if you do, usually after three or * * four times, they will bite your lips! And they don't let go for at * * least a minute. -- Lisa Coburn, age 9
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |