[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Seems, you meaned multipath. teql is another beast and it is
> > exactly, which is reauired in this case. Usage is trivial
> > and described in two lines in net/sched/sch_teql.c
> Excellent. So we can shoot eql.c for 2.4 ? (please...) and get rid of all
> the crufty master/slave stuff it has

There are also other reasons to kill eql - its buggy, and doesnt look like
the bugs will ever get fixed at this point. It should definitely die now
that there are better generic alternatives


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean