[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: What I suspect
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think it's a great notion, but it just sucks in real life. And it
> wouldn't allow the interesting things like gettimeofday() that really only
> the kernel can do: you can calibrate the clock in user space, but you
> cannot do things like automatically re-calibrate after a suspend event
> etc, which is critical on laptops and will be even more so with the new
> dual-frequency coppermine CPU's from Intel... (were not only the base time
> changes, but the frequency of the clock changes too).
> There _are_ a lot of issues like this where the kernel really knows things
> that user space can not easily know.

Wouldn't you specify

struct fast_time {
volatile int jiffies;
volatile int CPUspeed;
volatile int time_base;

such that the kernel can adjust these values whenever the "resume"
event comes in?


** ** ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
"I didn't say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame it on you."

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.102 / U:13.900 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site