[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions
    >On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    >> For the ret to userspace case it could decrease a bit the bh latency

    whoops I meant irq latency there.

    >> but it seems not a big issue, as right now a ret from syscall will act
    >> like while returning from an irq after the bottom half path.
    >bh latency is important in some cases, and often we do not return to
    >userspace for millisecs (tens of millisecs in other cases). This might
    >even explain some of the TCP oddities.

    Yes, agreed.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.022 / U:72.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site