[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions

On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> For the ret to userspace case it could decrease a bit the bh latency
> but it seems not a big issue, as right now a ret from syscall will act
> like while returning from an irq after the bottom half path.

bh latency is important in some cases, and often we do not return to
userspace for millisecs (tens of millisecs in other cases). This might
even explain some of the TCP oddities.

-- mingo

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.082 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site