Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 06 Dec 1999 20:39:50 +0100 | From | Manfred Spraul <> | Subject | Re: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions |
| |
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > It's not safe as do_bottom_half can return with irq disabled and it's not > safe to reenable the irqs inside enable_bh if enable_bh is be called with > irq disabled. I fixed both problems in this alternate patch (not compiled > too ;):
Is there a special reason why do_bottom_half() calls __sti() and __cli() directly? This seems wrong, what about using the normal __save_flags()/__sti()/__restore_flags()?
-- Manfred
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |