lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: sleep_on, wake_up question
    Date
    From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
    >
    > There is more at work than your code implies. If the interrupt occurs
    > instantly, before your call to interruptible_sleep_on(), the call will
    > return immediately. It works. I have many drivers using this technique
    > and they have never missed a beat.
    >
    No. Do not use sleep_on() in new drivers. sleep_on() can miss interrupts
    unless you own the global interrupt lock(*). Your driver could fail on SMP.

    Please use either wait_event() [only possible if you don't use spinlocks],
    or manually implement sleep_on(): [wait_event() + spin_unlock_irq() just
    before schedule() + spin_lock_irq() just behind schedule()].

    It's implemented in <linux/sched.h> for both 2.2 and 2.3

    (*) or lock_kernel(), but this is only possible from outside interrupt
    contexts.
    --
    Manfred





    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.023 / U:93.616 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site