Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Unexecutable stack | From | " "@deneb.cygnus.argh.org (Florian Weimer) | Date | 27 Dec 1999 22:49:13 +0100 |
| |
mike@katren.ru (Mike Karmyshev) writes:
> I've recently played a bit with Solar Designer's patch and it looks > that it doesn't have any significant overhead. Shoudn't it be in the > kernel by default(at least,SECURE_STACK)?
GCC needs an executable stack to implement nested subprograms, which are used quite frequently if you program for other GCC frontends than C or C++.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |