[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Unexecutable stack
Just for reference, here are the facts:

1) Not all architectures support this
2) It breaks trampoline code
3) It doesn't provide full protection
4) It does raise the bar significantly, in that it stops script kiddies
5) Most modern daemons are smart enough to switch to unprivileged UIDs when
parsing user input, and use strnxxx library functions.

I would say that all considered, it is not worthwhile unless you need to run
a bunch of old setuid programs. In that case, you are taking a big risk even
with the patch.

Zachary Amsden (650) 933-6919 09U-510 Core Protocols

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.105 / U:4.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site