[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch-2.3.35-pre2] fixed RAMDISK.
Hi Jeff,

Thanks for testing it but I suspect it has a problem. I have not verified
whether this is possible but imagine two requests for the same kdev_t dev
occur on two CPUs, then unless we protect access to rd_memory[minor] we
will get very bad things to happen.

I thought io_request_lock was supposed to guard this but I need to check
it when I get a spare minute.

Btw, I assume you got the latest version of it, i.e. the one on my site
AFTER I posted "now it is safe to try it"? The very original version had a
bug. If in doubt, get it again from:

Thanks again for taking time to look at it,
Tigran A. Aivazian |
Escalations Research Group | tel: +44-(0)1923-813796
Santa Cruz Operation Ltd |

On 23 Dec 1999, Jeff Uphoff wrote:

> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to as well.
> "TA" == Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.COM> writes:
> TA> Please review it:
> TA>
> TA> Tested only plain ramdisk part (not initrd, i.e.)
> Testing on initrd & it *almost* works: it mounts and some files are OK
> (e.g. my /bin/sh executes), but at least one (/linuxrc in this
> case...uh-oh!) shows up with its correct length but any reads on the
> file return as many NULLs as there are characters in the file.
> Investigating....
> --Up.
> --
> Jeffrey A. Uphoff
> Member of Technical Staff
> Transmeta Corporation
> Santa Clara, California, USA

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.059 / U:4.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site