Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:54:29 +0000 (GMT) | From | Tim Waugh <> | Subject | Re: Some more details on parport autoprobing bug |
| |
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Tim Waugh wrote:
> Does anyone have any strong objections to my removing the port reset at > initialisation? I'll make sure that tunelp can cause a reset via lp > (which I think is also broken at the moment).
Here's a patch which does this. tunelp -r still works. Shall I send it to Linus?
Tim. */
Index: linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c diff -u linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:1.1.1.8 linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:1.15 --- linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:1.1.1.8 Tue Nov 9 09:20:00 1999 +++ linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c Tue Dec 21 11:50:38 1999 @@ -1687,12 +1687,6 @@ parport_pc_write_data(p, 0); parport_pc_data_forward (p); - parport_pc_write_control(p, PARPORT_CONTROL_SELECT); - udelay (50); - parport_pc_write_control(p, - PARPORT_CONTROL_SELECT - | PARPORT_CONTROL_INIT); - udelay (50); /* Now that we've told the sharing engine about the port, and found out its characteristics, let the high-level drivers
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |