Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 19 Dec 1999 23:00:53 -0800 (PST) | From | raster@rasterma ... | Subject | Re: RasterMan on linux and threads |
| |
On 19 Dec, Martin Dalecki scribbled: -> raster@rasterman.com wrote: -> > -> > On 18 Dec, Ingo Molnar scribbled: -> > -> -> > -> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 raster@rasterman.com wrote: -> > -> -> > -> > On 17 Dec, Dan Kegel scribbled: -> > -> > -> re http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9912_03/msg00480.html -> > -> > -> -> > -> > -> Rasterman is wrong in saying that all threads run on the same -> > -> > -> > -> > hmm - when did that change ? [...] -> > -> -> > -> threads/processes ran on all CPUs concurrently ever since SMP Linux -> > -> existed. -> > -> > the preference weighting tries to kep themont he same cpu to some -> > extent - ut as allan poitned out - idle pu's will be preferred over -> > recyclign the came cpu - an that's exatly what i want... use up all he -> > cpu's u have - esecially if they're idle. -> -> Thank's Lord! Finally someone out there with a spelling even -> worser then myself!!
i try hard - it takes a lot of effort :)
-- --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster@rasterman.com raster@valinux.com raster@enlightenment.org raster@linux.com raster@zip.com.au
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |