lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Some more details on parport autoprobing bug
    On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:

    > 0.070001 seconds.

    !! Okay, so something like this ought to do the trick:

    Index: drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
    ===================================================================
    RCS file: /usr/local/src/cvsroot/linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c,v
    retrieving revision 1.13
    diff -u -r1.13 parport_pc.c
    --- drivers/parport/parport_pc.c 1999/11/08 17:04:56 1.13
    +++ drivers/parport/parport_pc.c 1999/12/20 17:05:22
    @@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@
    parport_pc_write_control(p,
    PARPORT_CONTROL_SELECT
    | PARPORT_CONTROL_INIT);
    - udelay (50);
    + schedule_timeout ((HZ + 4) / 5);

    /* Now that we've told the sharing engine about the port, and
    found out its characteristics, let the high-level drivers

    What about DMA then? Does specifying which DMA channel to use really make
    a difference to anyone?

    Tim.
    */


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.018 / U:1.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site