lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] asm*/resource.h fix for glibc
    Date
    From
    In message <19991217011701.A23083@cistron.nl>, Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
    +-----
    | According to Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH:
    | > In message <83bn5f$923$1@enterprise.cistron.net>, Miquel van Smoorenburg
    | > writes:
    | > | If glibc-devel has /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux-2.2.5-20/include/
    | linux
    | > | is there any reason not to put the 2.2.5-20 kernel headers directly
    | > | into /usr/include instead of via a symlink ?
    | >
    | > Because some of us upgrade our kernels without going through the whole RPM
    | > rigmarole and would prefer to be able to change one or two symlinks instead
    | > of copying all the headers?
    |
    | But you don't NEED to upgrade the kernel headers in /usr/include if
    | you upgrade the kernel. In fact that was the entire point of Linus'
    | posting. And mine. Sigh
    +--->8

    When new ioctls etc. show up, we do. In particular, I'm running 2.2.13ac3
    on RH5.2, so the old kernel includes (for 2.0.36) *are* wrong.

    --
    brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
    system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu
    carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh
    We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.020 / U:153.520 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site