[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?
    Constantine Gavrilov wrote:
    > Does this mean that only channel bonding (discussed previously in this thread)
    > can provide a required solution in this case?

    Bonding doesn't care about the protocol. Depending on the switch and
    network configuration, bonding/etherchannel only cares about mac
    hardware address.

    What bonding will do, is to round-robin send packets down the bonded
    interfaces. It's up to the switch/system on the other end to determine
    what to do with those packets.

    Thomas Davis | PDSF Project Leader |
    (510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.018 / U:15.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site