[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?
Constantine Gavrilov wrote:
> Does this mean that only channel bonding (discussed previously in this thread)
> can provide a required solution in this case?

Bonding doesn't care about the protocol. Depending on the switch and
network configuration, bonding/etherchannel only cares about mac
hardware address.

What bonding will do, is to round-robin send packets down the bonded
interfaces. It's up to the switch/system on the other end to determine
what to do with those packets.

Thomas Davis | PDSF Project Leader |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.029 / U:23.072 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site