[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux interrupt handling problem
> The requirement for a sti() in interrupts makes it impossible to utilize
> these priorities to achieve better interrupt perfomance. What other people
> sometimes would like to have - the ability to preempt slow interrupts -
> get we for free implemented in hardware, but we can't use it because of
> the above requirement. :(

I can find no requirement that sti() in interrupts actually does anything.
It seems quite permissible for it to be a non inside of an IRQ handler or
to only lower the level to the current irq level


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.065 / U:4.980 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site