lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: spin_unlock optimization(i386)
    On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
    >
    > >[..] I don't see anything that
    > >suggests a write on CPU 1 throws out a speculative read result on CPU 2.
    >
    > In one of Erich's email you'll see exactly that.

    Yes, I think I see it now. I wasn't understanding how the second processor
    noticed ordering problems on speculative reads, until I thought more
    carefully about snooping. Not quite magic, but pretty close.

    --
    "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:3.682 / U:0.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site