lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.14pre5: kmem_grow: Called nonatomically from int ...
"Petr Vandrovec Ing. VTEI" wrote:
>
> On 19 Nov 99 at 07:32 Manfred wrote:
> > > Hmm... nice! Is there a way to get a stacktrace without forcing an oops?
> > Several architectures have a 'show_stack()' function (eg
> > dik_show_trace() on alpha)
> > Unfortunately, i386 doesn't have that function.
> Hi,
> I missed original posting, so I write it here to the list.
> I'm using this patch for matroxfb debugging version - it prints
> CPU registers and call stack at the time of call to printstate()

Yes, I use a similar function. But obviously the result is not portable,
I always
remove these calls before submitting a patch to Linus.
IMHO a {printstate(),show_trace(),...} function that is supported by all
architectures would be a Good Thing(tm).

--
Manfred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.608 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site