[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Signal driven IO
> > Benchmark it for your application. For web and ftp traffic the I/O signals
> > are a clear winner.
> A clear winner regardless of how many file desciptors are ready per "loop
> pass"? Surely there has to be some number at which poll becomes superior.
> Certainly with artificial cases where you overload the CPU and deliberately
> hit multiple links at the same time.

Web traffic is very large numbers of slow operations. Your ration of
busy/queued is low. I'd agree there should be a point where you have a lot of
busy operations but web/ftp isnt it.

On a T1 you can expect to see 600 parallel connections. Each is averaging
2 or 3 K a second with a typical 1500 byte MTU. So each FD wakes one or two
times a second.

So we have 1200 wakeup events per second over 600 handles. Even at 100polls/sec
that means we get 12 positive handles and 588 overheads per poll. As it rises
to the real world values its hits 1 and 599 overhead at 1000 polls/sec


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.066 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site