Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:52:47 -0500 (EST) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: Mail conventions |
| |
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > Erik, > > I am copying the list so everyone understands what's up with this issue, > and by the way, I agree with you, and will attempt to do better. > > Any emails I send can end up as court exhibits, and could be subject to > sanctions and findings of acting in "bad faith" if it looks like I'm > redacting portions of them. Since we get sued by Novell at least once > per year, we have to produce massive amounts of email to their attorneys > during production requests. What you are talking about is "redacting" a > portion of the email thread. I have been personally fined by the > courts upwards of $100,000.00 per production requests for alleged > "missing" email fragments.
Can you cite the specific Court and docket number in which you were fined?
Cheers, Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.3.13 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips). Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |