lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)
From
Date
>>>>> "DT" == David Taylor <dtaylor@nildram.co.uk> writes:

DT> Since when did procfs give persistence? In my bootup scripts I
DT> have various things being echo'd > /proc/... -- I can't really see
DT> the difference between doing that and adding a few more lines to
DT> change the permissions on my /dev/ directory or whatever.

It was proposed in another thread to "overmount" or "unionize" devfs
with an underlying file system, so the underlying file system provides
the persistence. I would like this functionality for /proc, so
permissions can be altered permanently with just chown and chgrp.

Extra nice would be if the contents of the files in /proc/sys/* was
persistent, so I could take
echo '0' >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
out of my rc.local. That is probably not practical for files in other
parts of the /proc hierachy.


Benny





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.055 / U:1.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site