Messages in this thread | | | From | "Khimenko Victor" <> | Date | Sat, 9 Oct 1999 14:29:00 +0400 (MSD) | Subject | RE: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) ) |
| |
In <Pine.LNX.4.05.9910082210020.32297-100000@ns.snowman.net> Stephen Frost (sfrost@ns.snowman.net) wrote: > On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Shawn Leas wrote:
>> And I think they're bullshit, and they're NOT reasons >> to exclude the devfs, they are only reasons for you >> to not use it.
> How about instead of coming up w/ something that works for some > people and makes them happy, we try and work on coming up w/ something to > replace the current system (albiet this is much harder) that is acceptable > to everyone.
This is great idea. Just one problem: devfs exists for almost TWO YEARS now. I've seen A LOT OF complains. I've NOT SEEN any other code to solve the same problems.
Discussion is always the same: - We have problems: ... (read the devfs FAQ), here is solution. - Your solution is non-acceptable. - But what about problems ? - You solution is non-acceptable, go away. repeat 100 times...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |