lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) )
Date
In article <linux.kernel.19991007222450.63507@work.bitmover.com>,
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:

>One last comment: as far as I can tell, most people aren't against devfs,
>they are against the current implementation. The basic idea is useful at
>some level. If that is correct, perhaps you're all arguing about nothing
>(not that I've ever done that; sigh).

Well, the best way to fix the implementation would then be to
include it in 2.3.x and let the legion of kernel hackers fix the
problems with it.

____
david parsons \bi/ I wish there was a devfs for 2.0.<29 so I
\/ could be using it in non-test kernels.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.273 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site