Messages in this thread | | | From | Shawn Leas <> | Subject | RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation) | Date | Thu, 7 Oct 1999 20:49:13 -0500 |
| |
From: Dan Hollis [mailto:goemon@sasami.anime.net] Subject: Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)
>Im a devfs advocate but I agree the symlink design is bad. >Would an overmountable devfs address most of the arguments against it?
Hmm... Do we have an Open Source UnionFS imp. we can draw from?
It's what is needed, right? (I think?)
-Shawn
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |