lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectProposal: Split l-k into linux-kernel-devel and linux-kernel-stab le
Date
From: M Carling [mailto:m@idiom.com]
Subject: Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device
alloc ation) )

>This argument is not timely. 2.3/2.4 is closed for new features. 2.5.0
>is probably 6 to 12 months away, so the proponents of devfs have plenty of
>time to improve on it, test it, and enjoy using it. Until 2.5.0 is
>released, let's leave Linus in peace to get a stable 2.4 out.

While I agree it is a moot point for inclusion into 2.4,
lk is a place to discuss both devel and production kernel
issues. Maybe lk could be split? Especially now with the
accellerated dev cycles.

>In the meantime, the proponents of devfs could lobby the distributions to
>include it, but this is the wrong forum for that.

It is a kernel patch...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.038 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site