lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: USB device allocation
Date
In article <linux.kernel.19991007104127.C15982@wookie.chirp.com.au>,
Nathan Hand <nathanh@chirp.com.au> wrote:

>This is why I suggested losing the devfs FILESYSTEM but retaining what
>is devfs's INTENTION. Use the existing devfsd to maintain nodes on the
>disk. Most of the benefits are kept. Some problems are addressed.

Removing the filesystem makes devfs completely useless.


____
david parsons \bi/ Just what I'd want: a ``devfs'' that renders your
\/ machine unusable if the user-space daemon dumps core.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.237 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site