Messages in this thread | | | From | (david parsons) | Subject | Re: USB device allocation | Date | 7 Oct 1999 11:15:08 -0700 |
| |
In article <linux.kernel.19991007104127.C15982@wookie.chirp.com.au>, Nathan Hand <nathanh@chirp.com.au> wrote:
>This is why I suggested losing the devfs FILESYSTEM but retaining what >is devfs's INTENTION. Use the existing devfsd to maintain nodes on the >disk. Most of the benefits are kept. Some problems are addressed.
Removing the filesystem makes devfs completely useless.
____ david parsons \bi/ Just what I'd want: a ``devfs'' that renders your \/ machine unusable if the user-space daemon dumps core.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |