Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: USB device allocation | Date | Wed, 06 Oct 1999 10:23:55 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> said:
[...]
> With a decently sized dev_t we will still have the problem with a > cluttered /dev directory. With devfs we won't. And if you still want your > standard, cluttered, /dev directory, you can still have it with devfs. So > I can't really understand you being so negative in regard to devfs.
If you have hundreds of devices connected to your system, /dev is going to be cluttered. What has this to do with (or without) devfs? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |