[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: lock/unlock_super and inode bitmaps.
    On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
    > So, the question is - is it right to lock/unlock_super(sb) in
    > XXX_new_inode()/XXX_free_inode() or do I need to invent my own lock for
    > this purpose (or do I need no locks at all for some magical reason that
    > currently escapes me)? (and where is lock_super for the unlock_super in
    > minix_new_inode?)

    Interestingly, ext2_new_inode() does have the explicit lock_super(sb). So,
    could this be just a bug in minix_new_inode()?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.017 / U:15.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site