Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:12:53 +0930 (CST) | From | Alan Modra <> | Subject | RE: bootsect.S changes |
| |
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> [SNIPPED] > > > > opcodes, were fine' -- that was the sole plan at the moment: to have a 2.4 > > > kernel that doesn't need as86/ld86 to build. > > > > I can't imagine why. That's like deciding to rewrite the kernel so it > doesn't require GCC to build. AS86 was just a TOOL! We try to use the > appropriate tool for various purposes when the need arises. The > appropriate tool to assemble Intel mnemonics is one that understands > Intel. GAS does not. GAS doesn't even know the way Intel assembly > should be written, i.e., destination operand first.
You're behind the times :-) On a new gas, try
.intel_syntax
and
.att_syntax
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |