Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: HFS, QNXFS | Date | Fri, 15 Oct 1999 13:58:40 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > Both HFS and QNXFS has been in the kernel for quite some time, yet both > > are flagged Experimental. > > > > Is this still the case? Are they considered more unstable than other > > filesystems in the kernel? If they are considered unstable, HFS should > > be made if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" ] ... > > I've used both and yes they are both still buggy and should remain marked > as such. Is anybody still actively maintaining them?
HFS has a maintaier and seems pretty much rock solid in 2.2. The QNXfs is still very experimental. Its a read only "solves the migration from QNX to Linux" file system - no more.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |