lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scheduler cleanup
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Artur Skawina wrote:

>and mainly reduce lock contention), i don't see the problem...

You are avoiding _necessary_ yields. The other process may be blocked
waiting for a reschedule from you. You can't assume that the other tasks
have rescheduled the idle cpus. That may not happen to improve
performances in some case.

Andrea


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.474 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site