[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: scsi disk detection and /dev names, RE: My $.02 on the raging de vfs debate
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:

> In message <7ttjbt$rrq$>, H. Peter Anvin writes:
> +-----
> | too complex, noone will use them. Solaris has a very complete
> | location-based device naming scheme, but I know very few Solaris
> | administrators who use those names, as opposed to the short
> | symlinks.
> +--->8
> I know quite a few Solaris admins who do use them. It seems in my
> experience to correlate more with whether those admins came from a BSD /
> SunOS environment or a System V environment.

If you had read and followed the rest of his comment you would have
seen he was referring to the /devices tree as being not used often, while
admins tended to use the /dev tree (populated with symlinks). I have never
seen a Solaris system that had the /devices tree name in it's /etc/vfstab.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.056 / U:69.544 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site